The U.S. Senate is expected to reject the bills.

WASHINGTON — House measures approved this week seek to permanently bar oil drilling off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts, extend a moratorium off Florida's west coast and reinstate a ban in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

But the measures were widely expected to meet defeat in the Republican-controlled Senate.

Lawmakers from both parties along the affected coasts said the bills would protect their states from drilling that can pollute crucial waters and lead to disasters such as the 2010 BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Opponents, mostly Republicans, said the bills undercut domestic energy security and limit thousands of job opportunities.

On Wednesday, lawmakers approved the Atlantic and Pacific measure 238-189, while the bill to block drilling in the Gulf near Florida was approved 248-180. The bills head to the Republican-controlled Senate, where action is unlikely.

The Democrat-controlled House voted 225-193 on Thursday to reinstate a drilling ban in the Arctic refuge, home to polar bears, caribou, migratory birds and other species.

The Houma-Thibodaux area's two Republican congressmen, Garret Graves of Baton Rouge and Steve Scalise of Metairie, voted against the bans.

Graves said the measures would shift drilling to countries with looser regulations, resulting in far more damage to the global environment than producing the oil in the U.S.

“Once again they are legislating on emotions, not facts," Graves said in a statement Thursday, referring to Democratic House leaders. "If enacted, their efforts will ultimately backfire.”

U.S. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., vowed to fight the measures in the Senate.

"These bills threaten the jobs of millions of Americans and Louisianans that depend on the energy industry," Cassidy said. "They would also deprive future funds from going to the Land and Water Conservation Fund, Historic Preservation Fund and states that receive dollars under the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act, all of which fund projects to protect historic sites, the environment and provide outdoor recreation access across the country."

The votes come as the Trump administration is reevaluating a plan to sharply expand offshore drilling amid a series of court challenges.

Republican and Democratic governors and lawmakers from the affected coastal states strongly oppose expanded drilling. A federal judge in March ruled against President Donald Trump's executive order to open the Arctic Ocean and parts of the Atlantic to broader oil and gas development, saying Trump had exceeded his authority.

Interior Secretary David Bernhardt has called the legal challenges "discombobulating" to the administration's plans and said officials are likely to wait for the court cases to be resolved before proceeding with offshore drilling.

Even so, lawmakers who oppose drilling said a legislative fix is needed.

"If we don't act, drilling rigs could soon appear off our beaches," said Rep. Joe Cunningham, D-S.C., the lead sponsor of the bicoastal drilling ban. Cunningham won his seat last year in part because of his opposition to drilling off South Carolina's beach-dominated coast.

"The Low Country (near Charleston, S.C.) is a force to be reckoned with, and we stand firm in our opposition to drilling off our shoreline," Cunningham said. Offshore drilling could ruin the state's tourism-based economy, "ruin our vibrant natural resources" and harm the state's "unique way of life," he said.

"Drilling off the coast of Florida would create an industrial coastline less appealing to visitors, hinder our military readiness and adversely affect our environment," said Rep. Francis Rooney, R-Fla., co-sponsor of the Florida bill, which extends a moratorium set to expire in 2022.

Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, denounced the "liberal legislation aimed at derailing our domestic energy production and strong economy." The House-passed bill would stifle development of the nation's abundant fossil-fuel resources, increase reliance on foreign countries and "jeopardize unprecedented economic growth seen in recent years," Bishop said.

Bishop and other Republicans touted an alternative bill that would boost drilling on federal lands and offshore.

The GOP bill "is for all energy, all of the above, both fossil fuel and alternative, one that actually will grow our economy, create more jobs and give a logical standard of what we should do," Bishop said.

Rep. Bill Pascrell, D-N.J., said offshore drilling would devastate his state's "beautiful beaches, our workforce and our economy," adding, "I'll fight any effort to pollute our coasts with drilling."

Offshore drilling would harm New Jersey's booming tourism and fishing industries, Pascrell said, adding that it also could have a devastating impact on climate change. "As yet another report today makes clear, the earth is getting hotter. We need solutions, not more drilling," he said.

Tim Charters, vice president of the National Ocean Industries Association, which represents U.S. oilfield service companies, said the twin House votes Wednesday "should be recognized as what they are: the opening salvo of the so-called Green New Deal." Bills to block drilling "are not about limiting emissions or protecting the environment," he said. "They are about normalizing a shortsighted vision of an America where affordable and reliable energy resources are locked away indefinitely."

But Alex Taurel of the League of Conservation Voters said the votes were "further proof that protecting coastal economies from President Trump's plans to radically expand offshore drilling is not a partisan issue — it's common sense."

The question now, Taurel added, is whether Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell will allow votes on the bills "or will he continue to operate the Senate as a legislative graveyard and leave states like Florida, Georgia, North Carolina and Maine at risk of offshore drilling?"

-- The Courier and Daily Comet contributed to this story.